Course of the NOVA FCSH Summer School about the methods of oral history and its relationship with documentary film.

 

Metodologia da História Oral:

Como construir um projecto de memória audiovisual

[Oral History methods: how to build an audiovisual memory project]

 

 

Docente: Raquel Paulo Rato

Datas e Horários: 23 de Agosto a 4 de Setembro |  de 23 a 27 de Agosto e 30 de Agosto — das 17h30 às 20h00; 31 de Agosto e de 01 a 04 de Setembro — das 18h00 às 20h00;

Duração: 25h

Modalidade: presencial

 

Objectivos:

1. A História Oral como metodologia;
2. Destacar a importância da preservação da memória oral;
3. Qual a função dos testemunhos orais;
4. Como entrevistar um testemunho;
5. As várias fases e tipo de entrevistas: pesquisa em arquivos, primeiro encontro com o testemunho, criação do guião, entrevista, transcrição textual/ montagem audiovisual;
6. Traçar as principais linhas de orientação para a construção de um projeto de História Oral Audiovisual;
7. A relação da História Oral com o Cinema documental.

 

Programa resumido:

O curso irá incluir exposição de matéria, serão visionados excertos de documentários, com análise teórico/prática, seguidos de discussão coletiva. Apresentar-se-ão entrevistas a partir do projeto Palavras em Movimento: Testemunho vivo do Património Cinematográfico, financiado pela Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian 2019. O objectivo principal do projeto foi a criação e a partilha de uma plataforma digital que alberga as memórias dos testemunhos do cinema português das décadas 1960-1980. Em Palavrasemovimento, não se pretendeu substituir a História escrita, mas sim revelar vivências pelos testemunhos, isto é, toda uma série de realidades que raramente aparecem nos documentos escritos e complementar o saber já existente contribuindo para a valorização do cinema e seus autores. Vivemos numa era de revolução digital onde a produção e partilha de conhecimento é muito veloz, sendo importante trabalhar o seu armazenamento. A História Oral não é um fim em si mesma, mas é um meio para o conhecimento e a sua metodologia poderá ser adaptável a outro tipo de investigação científica, caso seja justificável..

 

🔗 Mais informações e inscrições

 

Crédito da imagem do cartaz: CoWomen — Unsplash.

Online course of the NOVA FCSH Summer School aiming to discuss the recent studies on the history of photography in Portugal.

 

Historiografia e História da Fotografia(s) em Portugal: estado da arte e releitura critica

 

Docentes: Paulo Catrica (IHC), Emília Tavares (MNAC), Filipa Lowndes Vicente (ICS), Sebastiano Raimondo (DINAMIA’CET), Susana Lourenço Marques (FBAUP) e Susana S. Martins (IHA)

Datas e Horários: 23 de Agosto a 3 de Setembro | das 18h00 às 21h00

Duração: 15h

Modalidade: online

 

Objectivos:

O objetivo principal é situar e discutir o estado da arte da Historiografia e da História da Fotografia(s) em Portugal. Partindo da análise do modelo historiográfico da obra de António Sena, História da imagem fotográfica em Portugal 1839-1997 (1998), o curso pretende discutir contributos recentes, que afirmam um posicionamento critico em relação à obra de Sena. Considera exposições de fotografia históricas, edições – monografias e catálogos, investigações e ensaios académicos. Esta releitura crítica pretende identificar momentos e interlocutores que através da suas práticas e investigação contribuíram para expandir o entendimento do que pode ser a história da fotografia e dos seus territórios de interesses.

 

Programa resumido:

1. Modulo 1: Releitura critica da obra de António Sena, (1998) – docente Susana Lourenço Marques.
2. Módulo 2: As exposições de fotografias históricas como hipótese de critica historiográfica: o caso da exposição de Joshua Benoliel – Lisboa Photo 2005 – docente Emília Tavares, curadora da exposição.
3. Módulo 3:  As Fotografias e a investigação académica nas Ciências Sociais, interesses, assuntos e abordagens – docente Filipa Lowndes Vicente.
4. Módulo 4: A investigação académica a partir da Teoria da Fotografia artigos – Susana S. Martins.
5. Módulo 5: Modelos historiográficos, perspetivas de investigação, a construção de um index bibliográfico e de referencias visuais – docentes Paulo Catrica e Sebastiano Raimondo

 

 

🔗 Mais informações e inscrições

 

Online course of the NOVA FCSH Summer School aiming to share the results of the research about the material heritage of the Estado Novo regime.

 

Arqueologia do Estado Novo

 

Docente: Xurxo Ayán Vila

Datas e Horários: 30 de Agosto a 3 de Setembro | das 15h00 às 18h00

Duração: 15h

Modalidade: online

 

Objectivos:

1. Socializar os resultados do primeiro projeto de Arqueologia do Passado Contemporâneo realizado em Portugal (Arqueologia do Estado Novo), apoiado pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (CEECIND/04218/2017).
2. Partilhar uma investigação pioneira e original com o público sobre o legado material do Estado Novo, numa altura em que há um debate público sobre a memória e o património vinculado à ditadura.
3. Divulgar, além da Academia, as materialidades geradas pelo projeto ideológico totalitário do Estado Novo mais também aquelas criadas pela resistência ao fascismo.
4. Mostrar aos cidadãos como o espaço rural e urbano do país ainda é marcado pelos projetos de engenharia social e os usos públicos da memória promovidos pela ditadura.

 

Programa resumido:

1. Lição 1 “A Arqueologia do Passado Recente. Uma introdução”.
2. Lição 2 “Onde há poder há resistência: arqueologia da guerra do Cambedo (1949)”
3. Lição 3 “Vigiar e punir: prisões, campos de concentração e campos de refugiados”.
4. Lição 4 “A morada do homen novo: materialidades da colonização agrária do salazarismo.
5. Lição 5 “Arqueologia da guerra civil espanhola: rastos materiais de Portugal no conflito bélico”.
6. Lição 6 “O que fazer com o legado material do Estado Novo? A controvérsia do Museo Salazar”

 

 

🔗 Mais informações e inscrições

 

A pre-congress seminar with Nuno Domingos aimed at students and early-career scholars taking part in the joint CESH/ISHPES Congress 2021, in Lisbon.

 

Sport History and Social Sciences: exploiting a fruitful relationship

Joint CESH/ISHPES Early Career Scholars Day

 

A seminar with Nuno Domingos (ICS – University of Lisbon)

Title: Football and colonialism

 

Students and Early Career Scholars who are taking part to the joint CESH/ISHPES Congress 2021 in Lisbon are invited to participate in a seminar on “Sport History and Social Sciences: exploiting a fruitful relationship,” with Dr. Nuno Domingos, anthropologist at the Institute of Social Sciences – University of Lisbon, and expert in Portuguese colonialism, historical anthropology, and the history of sport in Portugal.

The event will be held in a mixed mode (online and in-person) at the Institute of Contemporary History (IHC) — NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities, on 13 September 2021. Participants are encouraged to share their (interdisciplinary) research experiences, their ideas, their doubts and their perspectives on the topic, within a highly mutual and participative event. The seminar aims to foster a fertile trans-disciplinary dialogue within sport studies, among scholars of the next generation.

The event is free, so please sign-up in order to participate, and specify if you will join online or in presence (limited seats!), with an email to the organisers:

Dario Nardini: d.nardini@campus.unimib.it
Daniele Serapiglia: dserapiglia@fcsh.unl.pt
Rahul Kumar: rahul.m.kumar@gmail.com

The event is part of the CESH/ISHPES Congress 2021.

 

Image: National Stadium, Lisbon, Portugal, 1947. Colection Estúdio Horácio Novais. FCG — Biblioteca de Arte e Arquivos. (Source)

Congress of the European Committee for Sports History and the International Society for the History of Physical Education and Sport that aims to explore the historical configurations of the sports field and its relationship with a broad range of political processes. Call open until 31 March 2021 10 May 2021.

 

Sport and Politics from Antiquity to the Modern Day

Joint 2021 CESH / ISHPES Congress

 

 

The congress will be held in a mixed mode (online and in-person), to allow participation by all those who are unable to travel to Lisbon, given the mobility restrictions imposed by the pandemic crisis.

The 24th edition of CESH has been postponed and will be held from 14 to 16 September 2021 in Lisbon, Portugal, held jointly with the ISHPES congress. The theme of the CESH/ISHPES congress, “Sport and Politics from Antiquity to the Modern Day“, aims to explore the historical configurations of the sports field and its relationship with a broad range of political processes. The political meaning of sport is a contested affair and a source for multiple and conflicting arguments – ranging from sport as part of ‘bread and circus’ policies or as a terrain of ‘alienation’ and ‘discipline,’ to ideas about sport as an instrument for the promotion of peace, social integration and moral virtue, when duly insulated from the realm of politics. This relationship has been one of the most examined dimensions of sports history. In recent years a growing body of literature has focused on topics such as the link between sport and fascist and communist regimes; the analysis of government strategies of intervention in sports policy; the functions of sports mega-events at the level of international relations; the connection between sports and nationalism; the social, racial and gender inequalities embedded in sporting cultures and practices; or the organizational trans-formations associated with the globalization and commodification of sports. Despite the developments observed in the field, a number of questions about the historical and social conditions of possibility of modern sport and its political dimensions remain open to further inquiry.

While the modernity of sports, and their relation with capitalism and industrialization, is widely recognized, many of our representations and our theories about the historical nature and social location of sports are anchored around ideas that stress the continuities between modern sports and the rituals, spectacles and exercises that are considered its precursors. The political enjeux of sports can be seen, from this perspective, as one of those themes that free the historical imagination and allow us to discuss our current political predicament by placing it in the past. The 2021 CESH/ISHPES Congress calls for contributions that can shed new light on the historical transformation of sports ideologies, practices, agents and institutions and help us reconsider the relation between sports and power. We are particularly interested in papers that: 1) develop empirical analysis that extends our understanding of the political meaning of sports; 2) examine the theoretical and methodological models on which the relationship between sports and politics is grounded; and 3) discuss the way the field of sports history relates to other research fields in the discipline.

On a more substantive level, CESH/ISHPES 2021 welcomes contributions centred on, but not limited to, the following research themes and questions:

• Sport and political regimes: How can we make sense of the transformations of the sporting experience in different political regimes? Is it possible or not to put forward a political periodization of sport? What is fascist (or communist) about fascist (or communist) sports practices and spectacles? Is there an essential break between aristocratic, authoritarian and democratic sports (and, if yes, at what levels)?
• Sport, race and colonialism: What role did sport play in colonial empires? How did the colonial politics of racial differentiation and hierarchization shape sports? And how was the colonial project shaped by sporting practices and ideologies? What can we learn about decolonization processes by putting sports centre stage? How did newly independent nations negotiate imperial memories and/or political projects of autonomy through sport? How do racialization practices operate on the sports field?
• Sports organizations as political institutions: What is political about sports institutions and governance? How do the politics of sports organizations and clubs relate to other spheres of the political? What are the political stakes in conflicts taking place inside sports institutions? What type of political mobilization takes place inside sports organizations? How do sport organizations and practices relate with mass and popular culture?
• Sport and imagined communities: In what ways and in which scales do sports clubs and sporting institutions come to serve as foci of community identification? How do these systems vary historically and geographically? What type of institutions shape these identifications? How do media discourses reproduce and transform sports cultures and identities? How do the moral grammars of different fan cultures relate with other identification systems (ie religious, political, regional) and other moral grammars?
• Sports and governmentality: How have state policies shaped sporting practices and landscapes? Which groups are the main targets of biopolitical technologies? Under which rationalities have specialists of the sports field exercised and legitimised their power? Which institutions have been at the forefront of the manage-ment and administration of bodies through sport? What systems of classification and identification have been applied by different state agencies to sports practi-tioners, fans and institutions?
• Sport and international relations: What type of role does sport play in international relations? How do national and international political questions impact on the sports field? Does the globalization of different sports practices and images follow the patterns of the international political system or does it have its own specific logics? How do sports mega-events allow us to reframe power relations in a global world?
• Sport and Gender: How has the relationship between sport and gender evolved? What can a history of sport tell us about the construction of gender categories? How can we reconstruct our understanding of sports as gendered practices? How do sports practices contribute to the production of gendered bodies?

 

We welcome papers from historians, including those outside the field of sport history, as well as from researchers across the social sciences, namely anthropology, cultural studies, economics, geography, political science and sociology, tackling one or more of these themes and questions, as well as others.

Abstracts (maximum 300 words) along with a paragraph with biographical information, should be sent by email to: cesh.ishpes@fcsh.unl.pt by 31 March 2021 10 May 2021 [new deadline].

Besides individual papers, we also encourage the submission of panel proposals (up to three papers). In this case, convenors should also present an abstract for the panel (maximum 300 words) alongside the individual papers abstracts in a single file.

 

>> 📎 Download the Call for Papers <<

 

Keynote speakers (TBC):

– Barbara J. Keys (Durham University, United Kingdom)
– Patrick Clastres (Université de Lausanne, Switzerland)
– Stefano Pivato (Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy)

 

 

Costs

 

Participants must be affiliated with CESH, ISHPES or the IHC, host institution. For further details please check CESH’s or ISHPES’ homepages.

Registration deadline: 15 June 2021

Registration fee: 50 euros for all participants both in person and online. Information on the method of payment will be communicated with the e-mail of acceptance of the proposal. [NEW]

Registration fees will be fully refunded in case the congress is cancelled or postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

>> 📎 Download the information on lodging and payments <<

 

 

Organising Committee

 

Coordination

Daniele Serapiglia (Institute of Contemporary History — NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities)
Rahul Kumar (Institute of Contemporary History — NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities / Faculty of Economics — University of  Coimbra)

Members

Inês Brasão (Institute of Contemporary History — NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities / School of Tourism and Maritime Technology — Polytechnic of Leiria)
Nuno Domingos (Institute of Social Sciences — University of Lisbon)
Rita Nunes (NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities)
João Sedas Nunes (NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities)
Ana Santos (Faculty of Human Kinetics — University of Lisbon)

 

Scientific committee

Alejandro de la Viuda Serrano (Universidad de Alcalá)
Alejandro Quiroga (Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Newcastle University)
Anaïs Bohuon (Université Paris-Sud)
Annette R. Hofmann (Ludwigsburg University of Education)
Claire Nicolas (Université de Lausanne; SciencesPo Paris)
Daphné Bolz (University of Münster)
Dario Nardini (University of Florence)
Eleonora Belloni (Università degli Studi di Siena)
Fabien Archambault (Université de Limoges)
Georgia Cervin (University of Western Australia)
Grégory Quin (Université de Lausanne)
Javier González del Castillo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
Juan Antonio Simón (Universidad Europea de Madrid)
Malcolm MacLean (The University of Queensland; De Montfort University)
Martin Polley (De Montfort University)
Michael Krüger (University of Münster)
Mike Huggins (European Committee for Sports History; University of Cumbria)
Nicola Sbetti (Università di Bologna)
Patricia Vertinsky (University of British Columbia)
Patrizia Dogliani (Università di Bologna)
Philippe Vonnard (Université de Lausanne)
Pierre-Olaf Schut (Gustave Eiffel University)
Teresa González Aja (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)
Tomaž Pavlin (University of Ljubljana)
Victor Pereira (Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour)

 

Image: National Stadium, Lisbon, Portugal, 1947. Estúdio Horácio Novais Collection. FCG — Art Library and Ar-chives. (Source)

International congress aiming to promote a critical debate about the way digital and printed models are materialized and lived in different social and political contexts.

 

O digital, o tradicional, o novo normal?

3.º Congresso Internacional da Rede de Investigação Bibliotecas, Políticas, Leitura

 

 

Com esta actividade, em interdisciplinaridade científica, a Rede de Investigação Bibliotecas, Políticas, Leitura espera motivar a reflexão crítica e a troca de ideias e experiências sobre como os modelos do digital e do impresso são concretizados e vividos (edição, leitura) em diferentes contextos sociais e políticos, tendo em conta as realidades de desigualdade social agravadas pela pandemia globalizada. As comunidades profissionais e estudantis das ciências sociais e humanas, e da informação e documentação, as pessoas utilizadoras de serviços de bibliotecas e de arquivos encontrão neste quadro de análise motivos de interesse.

As comunicações (espanhol, italiano, inglês, português) distribuem-se pelos seguintes painéis:

• Prescrever, Mediar e Enquadrar a Leitura: funções de editor(a);
• Bibliotecas, Desigualdades sociais e serviços de leitura a cidadã(o)s carenciado(a)s;
• Literacia da Informação: o género, o digital, as desigualdades sociais;
• Políticas Públicas e Bibliotecas na América Latina;
• Biblioteche, lettura, Intelligenza Artificiale: servizi digitali verso il futuro.

 

Dois momentos de Leituras em Diversidade serão destinados à fruição de leituras de literatura de Cabo Verde, Portugal, Moçambique e de Itália, Espanha, Brasil – por voluntárias/os CES, coordenado por Maria José Paiva Fernandes Carvalho e Paula Sequeiros.

 

Programa:

 

Quinta-feira, 23 de Setembro

10h30 – 11h00  |  Acolhimento – comissão organizadora

11h00 – 11h30  |  Comunicação de Abertura [orador/a a confirmar]

11h50 -12h50  |  Painel 1  |  Prescrever, Mediar e Enquadrar a Leitura: funções de editor(a)
Coordenadora: Cláudia Sousa Pereira | Comentadora: Graça Capinha

O prazer das edições intercaladas – Luís Carmelo
O Acto Editorial como Prescrição Cultural – Nuno Medeiros e Emanuel Cameira
O livro cartonero em busca do leitor desconhecido – Gaudêncio Gaudério

14h30 – 15h30  |  Momentos de Leitura em Diversidade I – leituras de Cabo Verde, Portugal, Moçambique

15h50 -16h50  | Painel 2  |  Bibliotecas, Desigualdades sociais e serviços de leitura a cidadã(o)s carenciado(a)s
Coordenadora: Maria José Paiva Fernandes Carvalho | Comentadora Elsa Lechner

Serving Massachusetts’ Vibrant Brazilian Community – Shelley Quezada
Library Service Beyond Walls – Olivia Silva Melo
O impacto do covid-19 nas “bibliotecas vivas” e as consequências na tradição cultural da comunidade indígena Waiwai/Brasil: etnomemória e etnoidentidade – Mariza Pinheiro

Sexta-feira, 24 de Setembro

10h00 – 11h00  |  Painel 3  |  Literacia da Informação: o género, o digital, as desigualdades sociais
Coordenadora: Paula Sequeiros| Comentadora: Luciane Lucas dos Santos

Literacia da Informação de uma perspetiva feminista – Teresa Cunha e Paula Sequeiros
Repositórios institucionais, literacia da Informação e fluência digital: desafios renovados para os bibliotecários do ensino superior – Tatiana Sanches
Makerspaces y creación de espacios más igualitarios – Julio Alonso Arévalo

11h20 – 12h30  |  Momentos de Leitura em Diversidade II – leituras de Itália, Espanha, Brasil

14h00 – 15h00  |  Painel 4  |  Políticas Públicas e Bibliotecas na América Latina
Coordenadora: Ivana Borges Lins | Comentador: Jaime Alberto Bornacelly Castro

Reflexões sobre Políticas Públicas: estudos comparativos e políticos entre Brasil e Colômbia – Ivana Borges Lins
Transformação do conceito sobre Bibliotecas Públicas – Daniele Achilles
Perspectiva sobre Bibliotecas, políticas públicas e leitura na América Latina: o caso da Colômbia – Didier Alvarez Zapata

15h20 – 16h20  |  Painel 5  |  Biblioteche, lettura, Intelligenza Artificiale: servizi digitali verso il futuro
Coordenadora: Margarita Pérez Pulido | Comentador: Cristiano Gianolla

“Digital divide e social divide”: biblioteche e digitale nella percezione degli utenti e dei bibliotecari – Chiara Faggiolani & Maddalena Battaggia
Bias delle collezioni e data analysis: un modello di analisi comparativa – Sara Dinotola
Reading(&)Machine: Lettura e algoritmi per un nuovo modello di biblioteca pubblica – Maurizio Vivarelli
Ética bibliotecaria en ambiente digital – Margarita Pérez Pulido

16h30 – 17h15  |  Comunicação principal de encerramento.
La evolución de la publicación científica en la era digital: la vía diamante hacia la justicia epistémica – Arianna Becerril García

 

>> Notas biográficas (📎PDF) <<

 

Comissão Organizadora:

 

Paula Sequeiros e Maria José Carvalho (CES — Universidade de Coimbra)
Nuno Medeiros e Emanuel Cameira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Cláudia Sousa Pereira (CIDEHUS.UÉ)
Margarita Pérez Pulido (Universidad de Extremadura)
Maurizio Vivarelli (Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Studi Storici)
Chiara Faggiolani (Dipartimento di Lettere e culture moderne, Sapienza Università di Roma)

 

 

O congresso vai-se realizar através da plataforma Zoom, com inscrição gratuita, mas obrigatória e está limitada ao número de vagas disponíveis.

As inscrições estão abertas até 19 de Setembro neste 🔗link.

Informações: publibcongress19@ces.uc.pt

 

 

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

International congress to revisit and better understand a crucial period in contemporary Portuguese history, the 1820 Revolution. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it had to be postponed to 2021.

 

Bicentenary of the 1820 Revolution

International Congress

 

The Bicentenary of the 1820 Revolution presents both an opportunity and a challenge to revisit and better understand a crucial period in contemporary Portuguese history. The international congress marking this event is designed to indicate the main lines of interpretation that are to be found in the abundant historiography currently existing on this subject, as well as to encourage the presentation of new approaches and perspectives of analysis.

 

The 1820 Revolution was the founding event of liberalism in Portugal and Brazil. It was part of a broader movement that spread across Southern Europe and the two Latin American empires of the Atlantic region. In all cases, the epicentre consisted of political constitutions, inspired by the Spanish model of the 1812 Cadiz Constitution. The Nation, understood as a new political pillar of the constituent power of parliament, lay at the foundations of the broad concept of national sovereignty that characterised the first Portuguese Constitution of 1822. National independence was an aim that was inscribed in the goals of the 1820 revolution, as was also the case in other southern countries. The parallel outbreak of the movement for independence in the colonies of Latin America resulted in conflicts that would subsequently reveal the imperialist nature of Iberian liberalism.

The liberal movement in Southern Europe was counter-cyclical in relation to the political situation of Central and Northern Europe, namely France and England, which were now incorporated into the Holy Alliance, formed to guarantee the political stability of Europe after Napoleon. It was against this unfavourable international background that the complex process of the independence of the South American colonies first began to unfurl. The programme of this Congress seeks to reflect upon this geopolitical perspective of the revolutionary movement.

One of the characteristics of the revolutionary movement was its formal prudence. Frequently, the word “regeneration” was preferred to the term “revolution”, since it suggested moderation. The spectre of the violence of the French Revolution hung over both sides, those who wished for a change and those who defended the conservation of the status quo. The desire for moderation and the fear of unleashing conflicts were visible features of all the activity of the Cortes of 1821-22. However, the mere proclamation of the Basis of the Constitution and the rights of citizenship represented a profound shock to the existing society. The very concept of citizenship was revolutionary in itself and represented a major innovation in the relationship between the individual and the State, calling into question the corporative society of orders. A constitution defining the newly-established powers also represented a rupture with the pre-existing concept of royal power. This was how its enemies immediately understood things. Revolution and counter-revolution were the two different faces of this time, within which the thematic axes that form the structure for the programme of this Congress are also to be found intertwined.

Different generations of essayists and historians have turned their attention to the 1820 Revolution. Despite the considerable bibliography already existing about this event and its time, the commemoration of the bicentenary represents a challenge for reviewing the subject in the light of present-day historiography, as well as providing a stimulus for the presentation of new approaches and new perspectives of analysis. Accordingly, we now present the academic community with the programme for the Congress, setting out the thematic panels that seem to us to be the most relevant. In each case, the presentation of the themes is the responsibility of the coordinators who were invited to organise the respective sessions.

 

The oral communications approved by the Scientific Committee are available here.

 

Informations: cbr1820@gmail.com

 

>> 🔗 OFFICIAL WEBPAGE <<

 

 

Organising Committee

Miriam Halpern Pereira (ISCTE-IUL), President
Jorge Fernandes Alves (UPorto/FL)
Ana Cristina Araújo (UCoimbra/FL)
José Luís Cardoso (ULisboa/ICS)
Zília Osório de Castro (NOVA FCSH)
Maria Alexandre Lousada (ULisboa/FL)
Luís Espinha da Silveira (NOVA FCSH)

 

Scientific Committee

José Viriato Capela (UMinho)
Fátima Sá e Melo Ferreira (ISCTE-IUL)
Sérgio Campos Matos (ULisboa/FL)
Maria Fátima Nunes (UÉvora)
José Miguel Sardica (UCP/FCH)
Cristina Nogueira da Silva (UNL/FD)
Maria Beatriz Nizza da Silva (USP)
Susana Serpa Silva (UAçores)
Luís Reis Torgal (UCoimbra/FL)
Isabel Vargues (UCoimbra/FL)
Telmo Verdelho (UAveiro)

 

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Conference that aims to contribute to further reflect about and debate the different aspects that characterise the rise and political-electoral implementation of neo-fascism in the West. Call for papers: 30 April 2021

 

Neo-fascism and the radical right: from post-World War II to the 21st century

International Conference

 

Neo-fascism calls democracy into question, gives voice to racism and xenophobia, as well as denying freedoms, rights and guarantees. Its supporters question the impartiality and universality of educational, scientific and legal systems, they promote a nationalist agenda and relativise, or even restore, the fascist ideals, policies and practices that spread across Europe and the world between the two great wars. Therefore, neo-fascism is a phenomenon of unique international relevance and has already been the subject of extensive and multidisciplinary debate.
The defeat of Nazi-Fascism in World War II and the fall of the last fascist dictatorships in Europe (Portugal, Spain and Greece) in 1974-1977 shook the foundations of right-wing extremism. In the European-American political context, there was a widespread belief that anti-democratic, anti-liberal and nationalist policies were definitively laid to rest. The implosion of the socialist bloc led many to take it for grented that liberal democracy would be the uncontested model for social, political and economic organisation.
In this debate, it is of utmost importance to understand what factors contributed to creating this neo-fascism enabling environment, allowing it to influence governance and to have a very significant electoral representation in Europe and the Americas. Several studies seem to point, firstly, to the combination of the effects of neo-liberal policies and the tabloidization of the media and, more recently, to the creation of a new political culture focused on the construction and social reinforcement of prejudice. While the former called into question the duties and functions of a Welfare State, taking on openly authoritarian practices in what has come to be known as “surveillance capitalism”, the latter fuelled a growing sense of alarm and social anxiety. Both thus contributed to creating conditions conducive to the re-emergence, normalisation and mediatisation of neo-fascist discourse.

Hosted by the Transdisciplinary Culture, Space and Memory Research Centre (CITCEM) of the University of Porto’s Faculty of the Arts and Humanities, and by the Institute of Contemporary History (IHC) of NOVA University Lisbon, this conference aims to contribute to further reflection and an open, cross-cutting and multidisciplinary scientific debate on the different aspects that characterise the rise and political-electoral implementation of neo-fascism in the West, from the perspectives of history, sociology, philosophy, political science, communication sciences, law, and cultural and literary studies..

Everyone is thus invited to submit papers on the following topics:

– “Neo-fascism”, “far-right”, “national populism” and “radical right”: what these concepts mean and their importance;
– Fascism and neo-fascism in post-war history: values, experiences, organisations and power;
– Structures of the past: historiography of radical rights, saudosismo movement, historical revisionism and laundering of fascist regimes;
– The media, tabloidization, social media, fake news, surveillance capitalism;
– Neofascism and its relation with culture, education, art, literature and science;
– Religion and individual freedoms: homophobia, anti-feminism, racism
– National populism: historical continuity(ies), identitarian discourse, racism, xenophobia, “criminalisation” of migrants and neo-colonialism.

 

>> 📎 Download the call for papers (PDF) <<

 

Organising Committee:

Amélia Polónia (CITCEM/UP)
Bruno Madeira (CITCEM/UP)
Carla Ribeiro (CITCEM/UP)
Gaspar Martins Pereira (CITCEM/UP)
Manuel Loff (IHC — NOVA FCSH e FLUP)
Maria da Conceição Meireles Pereira (CITCEM/UP)
Steven Forti (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Virgílio Borges Pereira (IS/FLUP)

 

Scientific Board:

António Costa Pinto (ICS/ISCTE)
Fátima Ferreira (ICS/UM)
Fernando Rosas (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
José Neves (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Maria Inácia Rezola (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Miguel Bandeira Jerónimo (CES/UC)
Pedro Bacelar de Vasconcelos (DHCII/UM)
Rui Bebiano (CES/UC)
Vital Moreira (CEDIPRE/UC)

 

Secretariat:

Diana Felícia and Inês Rebanda (CITCEM/FLUP)

 

Deadlines for registration and submission of papers:

Submission of papers: 30 April 2021
Assessment of papers by reviewers: 31 May 2021
Response to authors: 30 June 2021
Final registration: 31 July 2021
22 and 23 October 2021 (Conference)

 

Registration fees*:

CITCEM and IHC members and participants who submitted papers – must register by 1 September; free
Other participants who did not submit papers: by 31 July 2020 – €30, between 1 August and 1 October 2021 – €60
Students: between 31 July and 1 October 2021 – €20
Free attendance (no access to documentation or coffee breaks)

* Includes documentation and coffee breaks

Attendance certificates will not be issued to those who are not present at the conference.
Online attendance and participation is possible.

 

Languages:

Portuguese, Spanish, English, and French

 

Contacts:

Tel: 226077177 | e-mail: citcem@letras.up.pt

 

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Colloquium that marks the 100-year anniversary of the Portuguese Communist Party, gathering researchers with a diverse set of views and backgrounds. CFP: 15 July 2021 31 July 2021 [NEW DEADLINE]

 

One hundred years of the Portuguese Communist Party

 

To mark the 100-year anniversary of the Portuguese Communist Party (PCP) the Institute of Contemporary at NOVA FCSH, will hold an International Colloquium, which aims to bring together a diverse set of views from researchers, regarding the oldest functioning party in the country.

PCP’s history spans several distinct historic periods, being irrevocably connected to Portugal’s history in the last one hundred years. Throughout the decades, it witnessed a military dictatorship, Estado Novo (a fascist regime), the 25th of April revolution and the revolutionary period that ensued, the genesis of the 1976 constitution and its disputed revisions, and finally the period between Portugal’s integration in the European Union and the present day. Through all of this, the party had ups and downs. Its evolution echoes a vast portion of the twentieth century as well as the complexities and challenges of our time.

Having been pivotal in the resistance to a dictatorship and in the establishment of a democracy, the party is controversial as a “living being” but of vast importance to History and interest to Human and Social Sciences in general. This is our viewpoint on this matter.

The fields of History and Political Science have been the main sources of studies on communism in Portugal, though other approaches have been rehearsed in larger or smaller scales. All standpoints on the subject have its merits and interest, from Sociology to Psychology, from Anthropology to Linguistics. In that sense, we call for all scientific contributions aiming at a plural and multidisciplinary dialog.

 

Call for papers

 

Proposals should be sent to the following address: coloquio.100anospcp@gmail.com and must be submitted until 15 July 2021 31 July 2021 [NEW DEADLINE] with the following elements:

– Title
– Abstract up to 3000 characters (including spaces)
– Brief biographical note of the author up to 1500 characters (including spaces)

The results will be communicated until the 31st of July 2021.

 

>> 📎 Download the PDF (PT/EN/ES) <<

 

Scientific Committee

 

Fernando Rosas (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
João Arsénio Nunes, (CEI-IUL)
João Madeira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
José Manuel Lopes Cordeiro (ICS-UM)
José Neves (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Manuel Loff (IHC — NOVA FCSH; FLUP)
Paula Godinho (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Silvestre Lacerda (ANTT-DGLAB)

 

Organising Committee

 

Adelino Cunha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Ana Sofia Ferreira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
André Pina (ISUP — FLUP)
Carlos Beirão de Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Cristina Nogueira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
João Madeira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Vanessa de Almeida (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Debate organised in the framework of the exhibition Freetown, by Samson Kambalu, at Culturgest. Open from 2 October to 6 February.

 

Situacionisms, Cinemas and Other Stories

 

Samson Kambalu‘s films and installations compel us to take a comparative look at the different ways of thinking in African and European territories, examining the way in which images and history are conceived and produced. Taking as our background the exhibition of this artist in our galleries, we will join three researchers from the Institute of Contemporary History (NOVA FCSH) together in a debate, encouraging us to think about the questions raised by his work: Ricardo Noronha, a researcher in the area of social and economic history, who is also interested in Situationism, a movement that serves as a major reference for Kambalu; Raquel Schefer, a film director and programmer, and a lecturer at the University Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3, who has conducted research into African cinema and the African diaspora; and Catarina Laranjeiro, who will also act as the moderator in this debate.

This debate is part of the activities of IHC’s thematic line Modern Mediations: Arts, Technology, and Communication at NOVA University Lisbon.

 

Curatorship:

Catarina Laranjeiro, Liliana Coutinho e Rui Lopes

 

Free entry with ticket pickup 30 min. before the session starts (subject to room capacity).

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Research seminar that seeks to address and question the apparent divorce between Economic History and Social History through the discussion of a few key-texts.

 

Mind the gap: dialogues between Social and Economic History

Research Seminar

 

Over the past few decades, Economic History and Social History have followed increasingly divergent trajectories, pursuing research agendas that are not only distinct, but often incommunicable. This gap is particularly visible with regard to the theoretical and methodological frameworks prevalent in each field, but also in their objects of study. Since there is no consensus on where to draw the line that separates what belongs to the economy from what belongs to society, this incommunicability has limited the possibility of exploring topics and problems located on both sides of that frontier. In addition, this gap contributes to the compartmentalisation of historiographical debate, fragmenting it into increasingly closed areas of specialisation. As a result, historians often find themselves forced to choose between a (predominantly) qualitative approach to Social History and a (predominantly) quantitative approach to Economic History.

This on-line research seminar seeks to address and question the aforementioned divorce, by enabling the discussion of a few key-texts that deal with theoretical and methodological problems across the fields of Social History, Economic History, Sociology of Science, Historical Sociology, Political Economy and Anthropology..

 

🔗 Free registration here

📎 Download full programme (PDF)

 

 

Programme:

 

07 October  |  William H. Sewell Jr., “Refiguring the Social in Social Science” (Logics of History)
Presented by Joana Dias Pereira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

21 October  |  Patrick Joyce, “What is the Social in Social History?”
Presented by Elisa Lopes da Silva (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

04 November  |  Bruno Latour, “Why is it so difficult to trace the social” and “How to keep the social flat” (Reassembling the Social)
Presented by Francisco Calafate Faria (independent researcher)

18 November  |  Ian Hacking, “Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers”
Presented by Gonçalo Morais (ISEL)

02 December  |  Timothy Mitchell, “The work of economics: how a discipline makes its world”
Presented by Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

16 December  |  Phillipe Mirowski and Edward Nik-Khah, “It’s not rational” (The Knowledge We have Lost in Information: A History of Information and Knowledge in Economics)
Presented by Tiago Mata (University College London)

 

Organisation:

Gonçalo Morais (ISEL), Henrique Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH), and Ricardo Noronha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)

Colloquium that marks the 100-year anniversary of the Portuguese Communist Party, gathering researchers with a diverse set of views and backgrounds. CFP: 15 July 2021 31 July 2021 [NEW DEADLINE]

 

One hundred years of the Portuguese Communist Party

 

To mark the 100-year anniversary of the Portuguese Communist Party (PCP) the Institute of Contemporary at NOVA FCSH, will hold an International Colloquium, which aims to bring together a diverse set of views from researchers, regarding the oldest functioning party in the country.

PCP’s history spans several distinct historic periods, being irrevocably connected to Portugal’s history in the last one hundred years. Throughout the decades, it witnessed a military dictatorship, Estado Novo (a fascist regime), the 25th of April revolution and the revolutionary period that ensued, the genesis of the 1976 constitution and its disputed revisions, and finally the period between Portugal’s integration in the European Union and the present day. Through all of this, the party had ups and downs. Its evolution echoes a vast portion of the twentieth century as well as the complexities and challenges of our time.

Having been pivotal in the resistance to a dictatorship and in the establishment of a democracy, the party is controversial as a “living being” but of vast importance to History and interest to Human and Social Sciences in general. This is our viewpoint on this matter.

The fields of History and Political Science have been the main sources of studies on communism in Portugal, though other approaches have been rehearsed in larger or smaller scales. All standpoints on the subject have its merits and interest, from Sociology to Psychology, from Anthropology to Linguistics. In that sense, we call for all scientific contributions aiming at a plural and multidisciplinary dialog.

 

Call for papers

 

Proposals should be sent to the following address: coloquio.100anospcp@gmail.com and must be submitted until 15 July 2021 31 July 2021 [NEW DEADLINE] with the following elements:

– Title
– Abstract up to 3000 characters (including spaces)
– Brief biographical note of the author up to 1500 characters (including spaces)

The results will be communicated until the 31st of July 2021.

 

>> 📎 Download the PDF (PT/EN/ES) <<

 

Scientific Committee

 

Fernando Rosas (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
João Arsénio Nunes, (CEI-IUL)
João Madeira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
José Manuel Lopes Cordeiro (ICS-UM)
José Neves (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Manuel Loff (IHC — NOVA FCSH; FLUP)
Paula Godinho (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Silvestre Lacerda (ANTT-DGLAB)

 

Organising Committee

 

Adelino Cunha (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Ana Sofia Ferreira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
André Pina (ISUP — FLUP)
Carlos Beirão de Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Cristina Nogueira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
João Madeira (IHC — NOVA FCSH)
Vanessa de Almeida (IHC — NOVA FCSH)