Workshop that intends to promote a collective investigation of the origins and development of global infrastructures, emphasizing how their construction interacted with colonial projects, capitalist ventures, and cultural superstructures.

Global Infrastructures:

The Production of the Modern World

The concept of “infrastructure” has become so central to contemporary societies that it has become increasingly difficult to specify what the term refers to. Rosalind Williams has described infrastructure as a “highly promiscuous concept” that, since its adoption in English in the late nineteenth century, has constantly taken on new meanings and connotations. Originated in the late nineteenth century, within a fairly restricted circle of French engineers, the term indicated the earth foundation on which the ties, rails and ballast of a railroad rest. Already in the 1955 Merriam-Webster dictionary, “infrastructure” had come to indicate the “underlying foundation or basic framework of an organization or system”. The development of the term is indicative of the rapid multiplication of entwined subterranean systems and networks – including tunnels, aqueducts, gas networks, electrical systems, and telephone cables – that sustain and support modern life. It also suggests both the political role that infrastructures historically play in supporting the “Operations of Capital” (Mezzadra and Neilson 2019; see also: Winner 1980, Mann 1984 or Larkin 2008) and a persisting emphasis on the vulnerability of these artifacts: at once persistently crucial for the global value chain and increasingly targeted in recent years by so-called “Circulation Struggles” and new forms of “Riot Logistics” (Clover 2016; Dyer-Witheford, Reyes and Liu 2020).

Infrastructures have been always conceptualized as being at once an invisible and fundamental substrate of modern societies: a series of installations that lay below more visible social structures and that enable both biological and social life (Guldi 2010, Easterling 2014, Schindler e Di Carlo 2022, Naqvi 2022). As modern life came to increasingly depend on the construction and maintenance of infrastructural networks, tending to the “national infrastructure” came to be conceived as a quintessential state task at once too critical and too massive to be conceived, implemented, and run by a single corporation. Infrastructure has historically indicated the state-provided, universally-distributed services that sustain the national economy of a sovereign state: water and sewerage, energy, transportation, telecommunication and information exchange.

In recent times, however, the concept of ‘infrastructures’ is going through a further wave of semantic contaminations and expansions. In 2009 Edwards et al. could still affirm that the word infrastructure «often (but not always) connotes big, durable, well-functioning systems and services, from railroads and highways to telephone, electric power, and the Internet» (2009, 365). Today, however, this definition seems excessively restrictive. The concept of infrastructure is now applied to “digital platforms” (van Dijck et al. 2018 – define Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft as «infrastructural platform»). After the pandemic the term spread even more virally, and it has been applied to other fields such as care or education. This proves that “infrastructures” is a dynamic category, which historically grows and mutates according to societal transformations. What persists is the complex set of relations between ‘infrastructures’ and ever-changing ways of governing capitalist societies, a link that we set to interrogate from a critical and political perspective.

From this point of view, there has been an increasing emphasis on the key role played by a series of old and new “global infrastructures”, whose construction is perceived to be at once too critical and too massive to be conceived, implemented, and run by a single state. Global infrastructures traverse national borders and contribute to the formation of new planetary geographies of inclusion and exclusion. Examples abound: global critical infrastructures encompasses anything from the submarine cables that sustain the Internet to global shipping routes, intercontinental canals, satellite telecommunication systems, transnational electric power grids. These global networks facilitate the material, digital, and capital flows that characterize the globalized economy, and necessitate the interaction of several sovereign states. The rapid expansion of multiple global infrastructures not only fosters new forms of connection, it also sparks global conflicts and rivalries: China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), for instance, has unleashed a race to construct transnational physical infrastructures in Eurasia and Africa. Meanwhile, major powers are competing to shape the emerging global digital infrastructure. In general terms, we can even conceptualize contemporary capitalism as an «infrastructural capitalism» (Borghi 2021) or a «Global Infrastructural Capitalism» (Ngai and Peier 2022), which is indicative of how essential it is to collective work towards theoretical frameworks and historical analyses of infrastructures both as an abstract concept and as a very material set of entwined industrial artifacts.

In the last twenty years, in correspondence with the growing importance assumed by Global History, numerous studies have analysed past border-crossings and long-established transnational networks. This seminar intends to contribute to the discipline by promoting a collective investigation of the origins and development of global infrastructures, emphasizing how their construction interacted with colonial projects, capitalist ventures, and cultural superstructures.

>> 📎 Full Programme (PDF) <<

Call for papers

The workshop will focus on questions such as:

– What global infrastructures have contributed to the construction of the modern world and the establishment of a single world market?
– Which public and private actors have participated to the construction and securing of global infrastructures?
– What ecologies of labour have been mobilized during the erection of global infrastructures?
– What forms of resistance and sabotage have opposed and slowed down the development of planetary infrastructures?
– What has been the impact of climate change and the ecological crisis on global infrastructures?
– How can the concept of infrastructure contribute to expand Marxist theories beyond the traditional distinction of economic structure and cultural superstructure?
– How can historical approaches help us rethink the relation between global infrastructures and imperialism?

We welcome papers dealing with all these aspects from an interdisciplinary perspective. Interested scholars are invited to send a long abstract between 400 and 700 words and a short bio to policante@fcsh.unl.pt and/or to mattia.frapporti2@unibo.it by 20th of April 9th of May 2023 [NEW].

Successful applicants will be communicated by the 10th of May and invited to the final workshop that will take place on the 9th of June 2023 at the University of Bologna in the Department of Arts.

>> 📎 Download the updated call for papers (PDF) <<

Seminar cycle, integrated in the Advanced Studies Platform of the IHC, where ongoing research work is discussed in a critical and constructive way.

Seminário de Teses de Doutoramento do IHC

Ciclo 2022/2023

Coordenação: Joana Beato Ribeiro, Joana Matias, Pamela Peres Cabreira, Rebeca Ávila, Rita Lucas Narra, Bruno Zorek, Pedro Martins e Rita Luís.

O seminário reúne numa das quarta-feiras de cada mês, entre as 10h e as 12h.

Em cada sessão serão discutidas duas investigações de doutoramento em curso, com apresentações de 10 minutos, seguidas pelos comentários de dois/duas discussants por apresentação (um doutorando/a e um investigador/a doutorado do IHC) e uma discussão colectiva construtiva. Os participantes fornecerão previamente um texto, que poderá ser: (i) uma proposta de investigação submetida à FCT ou ao IHC para obtenção de bolsa, (ii) o trabalho final de curso apresentado no final da parte lectiva do doutoramento, (iii) um capítulo da futura tese de doutoramento, (iv) a introdução ou conclusão da mesma.

A leitura prévia do texto é condição de participação nas sessões, que decorrerão sobretudo através do Zoom.

Quem desejar receber os textos e os links para cada sessão deverá solicitá-los ao Pedro Martins através do email pedromartins@fcsh.unl.pt.

PROGRAMA 2022/2023

Sessão #1  |  26 de Outubro de 2022
Rebeca Ávila – “Brasil, Cuba e as violências políticas em África. Colonialidade e racialidade durante a Guerra Fria (1961-1988)“
Comentário de Sofia Lisboa e Raquel Ribeiro
Ricardo Mignorance – “Arquivos de Governação Colonial e Pós-Colonial: percursos e histórico de custódia entre Portugal e Brasil durante os séculos XIX e XX“
Comentário de Bruna Santiago e Bruno Zorek

Sessão #2  |  14 de Dezembro de 2022
Catarina Teixeira – “O ‘Museu de Anatomia’ da Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa (1825-1970): a biografia de um acervo invisível“
Comentário de Joana Beato Ribeiro e Ângela Salgueiro

Sessão #3  |  18 de Janeiro de 2023
Daniel Freire Santos – “Vou à bola! Culturas Adeptas, Economia Política e Estado na História do Futebol em Portugal (1910-2020)“
Comentário de Gil Gonçalves e Rahul Kumar
Maria Manuela Gomes – “A Fotografia de Amador e de Salão em Portugal, através da Secção de Fotografia do Grupo Desportivo da C.U.F. (1951-1963)“
Comentário de Paulo Catrica

Sessão #4  |  15 de Fevereiro de 2023
Joaquim Melon Simões – “O Conselho de Saúde Pública e as políticas sanitárias oitocentistas (1837-1868)“
Comentário de Pedro Mota Tavares
João Luís Sequeira – “Humanizar a arqueologia industrial – Desigualdade, identidade e conflito na fábrica e as inter-relações no património arqueológico industrial do Século XX“
Comentário de João Pedro Santos e Xurxo Ayán Vila

Sessão #5  |  22 de Março de 2023
José Augusto Pereira – “O império Português e as Migrações: o caso de Cabo Verde e S. Tomé e Príncipe entre 1930 e 1974“
Comentário de Leonor Pires Martins e Marta Macedo
Maria José Oliveira – “A emigração económica portuguesa na Guerra Civil de Espanha. Galiza e Astúrias. 1936-1945: combatentes pela República, vítimas do Franquismo“
Comentário de Rui Aballe Vieira e Marta Silva

Sessão #6  |  19 de Abril de 2022
Tomás Diel Melícias – “Por bem ou por Mao: o pensamento maoísta na construção política da União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola (1966 – 1975)“
Comentário de Rebeca Ávila e Rui Lopes
Paulo Jorge – “A resistência ao Estado Novo no concelho de Almada (1961-1974)“
Comentário de Ana Sofia Ferreira

Sessão #7  |  17 de Maio de 2023
Inês José – “Alimentar na Guerra e na Paz: os impactos económicos e sociais da escassez (1914–1929)“
Comentário de Pedro Mota Tavares e Miguel Carmo
Jorge Mano Torres – “O Instituto Nacional do Trabalho e Previdência (INTP) e o Corporativismo Português (1933-1974): As Delegações de Braga e Covilhã“
Comentário de Elisa Lopes da Silva

Sessão #8  |  21 de Junho de 2023
Joana Beato Ribeiro – “Identidade(s) científica(s): o património documental de Fernando da Silva Correia (1893-1966)”
Comentário de Joana Matias e Quintino Lopes
João Amendoeira Peixoto – “Medicina e Património cultural em Tomar: o caso do Dr. José Vieira da Silva Guimarães”

Sessão #9  |  19 de Julho de 2023
Sofia Lisboa – “O Museu Nacional Resistência e Liberdade (Peniche) e a Memória da Violência Política do Século XX: Estudo Comparado entre Portugal, a África do Sul e o Chile”
Comentário de Miguel Filipe Silva e Giulia Strippoli
Inês Ferreira de Almeida – “Corpos Femininos, Presos Políticos: A Violência Policial face às Mulheres na Resistência ao Regime Fascista”
Comentário de Pamela Peres Cabreira e Elisabetta Girotto

Fifth (and final) seminar of the Associated Laboratory IN2PAST, dedicated to the Exploratory Projects ongoing in 2023. PI: Hélia Marçal.

MATERIA: Towards a critical lexicon of materiality in the arts and heritage

Apresentação de Hélia Marçal (IR; IHC — NOVA FCSH / UCL) e demais equipa do projecto: Daniela Salazar (IHA — NOVA FCSH), Rui Lopes (IHC — NOVA FCSH) e Leonel Alegre (HERCULES — Universidade de Évora).

Comentários de Sónia Vespeira de Almeida (CRIA — NOVA FCSH)

Although matter and materiality are intrinsic to the arts and heritage fields, the terms underpinning discourse and practice around its manifestations are arguably more contested than ever. Negotiating terms and their boundaries becomes an essential task when redefining materialities and their past, present, and future. Understanding what matters in material culture and the various disciplines underpinning its study will help us understand decision-making processes regarding the conservation, historicisation, and overall transmission of art and heritage practices.
This seed project aims to set the basis for creating a critical lexicon addressing the diverse ways in which materiality is performed within the arts and heritage fields, and, specifically, in museum practice. It draws on existing efforts to interrogate how we understand matter and knowledge (specifically through posthumanism) to expand the idea of materiality in itself by creating a lexicon. Due to their intrinsic relationship with language (and, therefore, culture and practice), lexicons have particular potential to emerge as critical tools to rehearse forms of situated practice.
The project will be developed in three stages: (1) identification of challenges current terms pose to a posthuman ideal of arts and heritage, (2) identification of critical terms, (3) writing up of entries for 12 terms. Relevant challenges will include the current climate emergency, social erasures of racialised groups, and forms of capitalist extractivism. Applicable terms will be identified through three collaborative laboratories that will bring together team members and invited contributors. In these Collaborative Laboratories (CL) context, the project will reach out to scholars and practitioners from critical race and decolonial theory, philosophy of science, and ecofeminism to address issues of misrecognition and extractivism, alternative epistemologies, and climate emergency, respectively. Specifically, we will invite participants from the areas of (CL1) performing arts and critical race and decolonial theory, (CL2) the visual arts and philosophy of science, and (CL3) historiographical practices and ecofeminism.

SESSÃO ONLINE

🔗 Link para a sessão via Zoom